by The Office, The Office [distributor in Washington, D.C, Gaithersburg, MD (P.O. Box 6015, Gaithersburg 20877) .
Written in English
|Other titles||EPA could do more to minimize cleanup delays at the Clark Fork sites|
|Statement||United States General Accounting Office|
|The Physical Object|
|Number of Pages||69|
Get this from a library! Superfund: EPA could do more to minimize cleanup delays at the Clark Fork sites: report to the Chairman, Subcommittee on Environmental Protection, Committee on Environment and Public Works, U.S. Senate. [United States. General Accounting Office.; United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Environment and Public Works. Get this from a library! Superfund: EPA Could Do More to Minimize Cleanup Delays at the Clark Fork Sites.. [GENERAL ACCOUNTING OFFICE WASHINGTON DC RESOURCES COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVE LOPMENT DIV.;] -- This report assesses the progress and problems of the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) cleanup of the Clark Fork Superfund sites . Fifteen years after Congress allowed the "polluter tax" on oil and chemical industries to expire, nearly 1, contaminated sites remain on the EPA's Superfund list, awaiting funding to be cleaned up. The EPA’s Superfund Cleanup Process at Portland Harbor March Cleaning up Superfund sites is a complex, multi-phased process. The steps outlined below represent past project milestones for the Portland Harbor Superfund Site as well as current and future phases of the project. Timelines for current and future phases are estimates andFile Size: KB.
*Water-Quality Trends and Constituent-Transport Analysis for Selected Sampling Sites in the Milltown Reservoir/Clark Fork River Superfund Site in the Upper Clark Fork Basin, Montana, Water Years , by Steven Sando and Aldo Vecchia. Scientific Investigations Report , U.S. Geological Survey, EPA's goal is to make sure site cleanup is consistent with the likely future use of a site. Consideration of reuse at a site can occur at any point in the Superfund cleanup process, from site investigation activities to deletion from the NPL. EPA works with communities to make sure sites or portions of sites are used safely. The Clark Fork River runs free through what was once a dirty reservoir filled with millions of cubic tons of mining waste. While the river corridor has come a long ways over the past few decades, advocates fear President Donald Trump’s proposed cuts to the EPA and Superfund could jeopardize future cleanup. Putting people to work to clean up our land and revitalize communities. EPA’s Superfund program has located, analyzed and worked to cleanup thousands of hazardous waste sites since Today, Region 2 has toxic and hazardous waste sites on the Superfund National Priority List (NPL).
The majority of the cleanup will occur along a mile stretch of the river from Warm Springs in Anaconda/Deer Lodge County downstream to Garrison in Powell County. This is known as “Reach A.” The Clark Fork River Operable Unit (CFR OU) is part of the Milltown Reservoir/Clark Fork River Superfund Site. Discovering Superfund Sites Taking Action to Clean Up Polluted Sites Superfund sites are “discovered” when the presence of hazardous waste is made known to EPA. The presence of contaminants is often reported by residents, local, state, tribal or federal agencies, or businesses. Sometimes these hazardous wastes are found by EPA. BP-ARCO foots the Clark Fork cleanup bill today. Arsenic was first found seeping into downstream wells in , unleashing a rash of Superfund designations cascading upstream toward their source. National Priorities List (NPL) Site Listing Process. The NPL is a list of the most serious sites identified for long-term cleanup. When EPA proposes to add a site to the NPL, the Agency publishes a public notice about its intention in the Federal Register and issues a public notice through the local media to notify the community, so interested members of the community can .